> We take seriously the security of any information stored on our servers and take all reasonable precautions to protect this information.
All reasonable precautions?
What's that supposed to mean?
You got internal policies in place that not all engineers are able to access these messages according to their contract?
This type of data should be e2e encrypted, pushbullet shouldn't even be able to decrypt it and messages should disappear from pushbullet servers as soon as the message is pushed to all devices.
I've been using pushbullet for years but now I'm considering disabling the sms sync feature, the privacy policy looks really shady and Google has all the right to call it out.
Yep, Google's communication was pretty unclear, but the developer is being repeatedly called out for the same underlying problem which they haven't addressed at all.
> We take seriously the security of any information stored on our servers and take all reasonable precautions to protect this information.
All reasonable precautions?
What's that supposed to mean?
You got internal policies in place that not all engineers are able to access these messages according to their contract?
This type of data should be e2e encrypted, pushbullet shouldn't even be able to decrypt it and messages should disappear from pushbullet servers as soon as the message is pushed to all devices.
I've been using pushbullet for years but now I'm considering disabling the sms sync feature, the privacy policy looks really shady and Google has all the right to call it out.