Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You couldn't pay me to use anything Oracle based. I'd much rather take my chances with AWS or another host than use Oracle.



What is the distinction between Bezos vs. Ellison? They are both sociopathic jerks. In any case, more power to you, friend.

In my eyes, a rented server is a rented server regardless of which data center or network provider is behind it. It's not emotional, merely an optimization game.


Amazon/AWS is playing the long game, not raising prices (and even lowering them) even though many of their customers are thoroughly locked in; and of producing products that are pretty popular with users.

Most of their assholery is towards employees, suppliers, and competitors - rather than customers.

Oracle, on the other hand, has a reputation for extracting maximum money from locked-in customers; an aggressive legal team; and producing products like Oracle Financials which are widely hated by users.


Debatably, Amazon is focused on delivering a good product ("customer focused"). Oracle feels far more likely to "trick" you into a costly financial arrangement where you are offered a deal you cannot refuse.


I've found OCI to be roughly on par with AWS for compute and networking. I've had the free tier account and corresponding instances for more than 5 years now with zero issues.

With that said, it's generally good advice to not count or rely on anything free for important things.

Hence the motivation behind this story; Heroku used to be free and now it's evaporating away back into the ether.

My only goal here is to provide helpful information. Cheers.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: