> Everyone knows that's a goddamn lie. I almost want to cry when I read that
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him."
Racism is anti-racist. Objective thinking is biased. Burning down cities is mostly peaceful protest.
The article states that it’s spread over 20 states, which I think is an important caveat to note. Not that it isn’t still a large sum of money, but that it’s a far smaller sum in any given location.
Especially important to note because my original comment was in reply to someone claiming that cities had burned to the ground.
It’s an overstated claim that functions as a dog whistle.
Only if anyone want to live there. Why would anyone want to purchase a house or live in a place how ever affordable it is, where a mob might burn their house down.
The way I read this is that the more desirable a city is to property devs, the lower the cost of housing, which seems true. Affordable housing = Less scarcity, less scarcity comes from building more
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him."
Racism is anti-racist. Objective thinking is biased. Burning down cities is mostly peaceful protest.