Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

To compete with the newer, blazingly fast tools



What are the competitors in the jq space?


At least jaq[1] gojq[2], and jp[3] (this last of which is jmespath rather than the jq query language)

[1]: https://github.com/01mf02/jaq

[2]: https://github.com/itchyny/gojq

[3]: https://github.com/jmespath/jp


I especially love gojq thanks to this change:

    $ echo '{"alpha":"beta"}' | jq -r '"hello \(.alpha\)"'
    jq: error: syntax error, unexpected INVALID_CHARACTER (Unix shell quoting issues?) at <top-level>, line 1:
    "hello \(.alpha\)"
    jq: 1 compile error

    $ echo '{"alpha":"beta"}' | gojq -r '"hello \(.alpha\)"'
    gojq: invalid query: "hello \(.alpha\)"
        "hello \(.alpha\)"
                       ^  unexpected token "\\"
because (a) muscle memory (b) sure, it's easy to spot that mistake in an 18 character expression, but for bigger ones, getouttahere


There's a particularly complicated system I built a few years ago that heavily leaned on jq for configuring some backend systems. It had lots of variables piped in and so that particular error was common. From your snippet, I'm pretty sure gojq would have saved me many hours of debugging.


Yeah the ergonomy and error messaging of jq is complicated

I'm not a big fan of the language, but it works


jp --help

"It's complicated, you know"


Xidel for XPath on JSON, XML, and HTML: https://github.com/benibela/xidel




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: