Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah, but you don't need SPDY as much on the application servers as you do the frontline servers (Apache, nginx, lighttpd...) where its benefits are more pronounced.



Apache already has a mod-spdy (https://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/), and varnish is in wait-and-see mode (https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/2... "SPDY isn't even an official IETF draft yet")

I agree. Getting SPDY into Apache, ngnix, varnish, squid etc. would be all we need to get the benefits of this new protocol.

The front-end SPDY server could then communicate via HTTP via a low-latency connection.


Excellent point. A SPDY->HTTP proxy or SPDY support in tools like perlbal, squid and Varnish would go a long way.


Nginx reports that it is in the works, but no ETA: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,217299,217325




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: