Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Alternative explanation is that the board brought Dorsey back because they were toxic and wanted someone they could contain/control.

Dorsey comes back out of love and is trapped by his attachment to the possibility, but has unconsciously accepted he can never achieve it.

The “CEO is/isn’t a job” argument above is reflected in this. Dorsey wasn’t ever Jobs, or Michael Dell. They wouldn’t have brought him back if he was.




Dorsey was never the controllable option, his net worth is tied into his other weird crypto scam, not twitter. He might have come back out of love, but he never showed twitter the attention it deserved- at a minimum, working 9-5 on twitter not block.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: