Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> All the old, problematic approaches are still valid code, and hence from a security perspective they are vulnerabilities.

So, you would mandate using Rust without "unsafe", then? Good luck with that.




Perfect is the enemy of good. If you can avoid "unsafe", then yes: forbid it. If you can't, then permit it for only those modules which need it; and have them expose a safer API, for use by the rest of the safe-subset-of-Rust system.


This argument is indistinguishable from what you are trying to rebut.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: