This is still silly. You're starting with some true things:
- The US has a fractional reserve systems and debt is a pseudo-currency within fractional reserve systems
- The US has a significant national debt
- The US invades foreign countries and has problems with class structure and poverty
However, your attempt to link them fails horribly in light with the last point not being true of countries which have proportionally more debt. There's not even correlation, much less a reasonable argument for causation. Honestly, I don't really care one way or the other about the fractional reserve system. I'm not starting with a particular viewpoint and trying to defend it. I'm just pointing out that your argumentation is flawed.
Forget it ;) You are one of those guys who just wants to look at the facts for what they are, and you never want to draw conclusions about anything. You look at a robbery and see that items are missing, but you could never draw an assumption about how it happened, or who took the stuff.
If you want to be spoon-fed your information in order to have the dots connected for you, and not spend much time or effort on thinking: re-read what I've said, and this time don't get stuck in tunnel vision looking at only the facts because you have some preconceived notion of the US economy.
- The US has a fractional reserve systems and debt is a pseudo-currency within fractional reserve systems
- The US has a significant national debt
- The US invades foreign countries and has problems with class structure and poverty
However, your attempt to link them fails horribly in light with the last point not being true of countries which have proportionally more debt. There's not even correlation, much less a reasonable argument for causation. Honestly, I don't really care one way or the other about the fractional reserve system. I'm not starting with a particular viewpoint and trying to defend it. I'm just pointing out that your argumentation is flawed.