Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I have no horse in this race and pardon my nitpicking but those two phrases are not equivalent.

For E2EE,you describe the base level capability: Secure message between two parties.

For Mixers, you describe an act that the capability of making money hard to trace enables: Money laundering. If you applied a similar argument to E2EE (as many have and will keep doing), encrypted communications are a way for people to do illegal things away from the eyes of the law. Trade illegal items, send banned/illegal/questionable content, etc.

From a pure capability standpoint, mixers, like E2EE, are a way to secure XYZ activity (Which happens to be money transfer) from prying eyes.




TC was designed to obscure the source of funds. Obscuring the source of funds is money laundering.

You're drawing a distinction between illicit and privacy-seeking transaction and I'm saying the act of obscuring the source is all that matters.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: