Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Even before that, much of the UI of DOS itself is Unix inspired

The inspiration rather came from CP/M.




...which in turn was strongly influenced by a previous product from DEC.

"Various aspects of CP/M were influenced by the TOPS-10 operating system of the DECsystem-10 mainframe computer, which Kildall had used as a development environment."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP/M


Not exactly - several "killer features" of DOS 2.0 were features inspired by Xenix and which were not present in CP/M, including a /DEV/ directory, the mere concept of hierarchical filesystem and optional use of forward slashes in directory paths - backslashes were introduced because of CP/M legacy in commands


No they weren't.

This is an urban myth of computing, and it needs to die.

CP/M commands did not accept command-line switches in any standard way. You are trying to "correct" people who are telling the real story by repeating a myth.

http://www.os2museum.com/wp/why-does-windows-really-use-back...


Ah, I seem to have been waylaid by some of the older mentions there - thanks for the link with mention of M-DOS. I was certain of DEC connections, but thought it came through CP/M and forgot to take into account PDP-10 history of Microsoft.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: