> Stay in your concrete hellhole, and stop acting like you know what's best for everyone else.

So the side advocating for upzoning (allowing people to build what they want on their own properties) is "acting like they know what's best for everyone else" while you, advocating for strict limits on what others can do on their own properties according to your desires, aren't?

I guess we can make this consistent if you admit you're doing something you know isn't best for everyone else, and aren't even trying to. Which would be fine if you weren't using the state to support your aims.

If we don't do that, and both sides are trying to do what they think is best for everyone, this is a difference in degree not kind. There obviously need to be limits on any zoning.

> because you clearly can't stand for people to live in ways you don't agree with

You are in support of using the coercive power of government to restrict your neighbors from living in ways you disagree with, if those ways include building more housing!

It's pretty obvious how GP values other people vs themselves. They've stated it clearly and repeatedly.