Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If they can be bribed once they can be bought twice. And it's a reminder to everyone that if you aren't getting the engagement your content deserves then it's a possibility that you are being deliberately sabotaged.



META was not bribed. Individuals were bribed, that's a monster difference.

Also, if you're not getting 'engagement' it's 99.999% chance that something other than 'bribery' is happening.

Shenanigans are common, but this specific kind is not very common. I'm doubtful people at META are going in on some schemes like this.


If Meta employees can flag anybody they want without (effective) internal checks and balances, then I'd say Meta is guilty by omission.


That's fair. Flagging someone should require some kind of legitimate attribution.


Shenanigans are common, but this specific kind is not very common.

How could anyone know that? No government cares to investigate this sort of thing, and those individuals who could become aware would mostly be subject to NDA.


Because it's not hard to figure out 'something' is going on, and, the level of 'bribery' in general for these kinds of things at above board corporations is rare.


"Not hard" for whom? The individual private porn producers? ITT you specifically disbelieve those exact people!

Only those who work in the right positions within Meta or one of these other horrible companies would have a good view into this, and they have no incentive to set things right.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: