"Both XXX and Astro are frameworks for building websites. XXX does best with highly dynamic websites (like dashboards and inboxes) while Astro does best with highly static websites (like content and eCommerce websites)."
This explanation is used for every XXX framework, but i can't really see why. With components you can show high dynamic data, so for me there is no difference if i use XXX or Astro.
Did somebody has some real life examples, that could explain the difference?
Or why it could be better to stay with XXX and not use Astro.
Currently we want to switch our svelte project to SvelteKit, git rid of our custom fiddle (router, etc.). But when i see Astro now, i think about what speak against using Astro? But at the moment it seems that it has many additional benefits?
https://docs.astro.build/en/comparing-astro-vs-other-tools/
"Both XXX and Astro are frameworks for building websites. XXX does best with highly dynamic websites (like dashboards and inboxes) while Astro does best with highly static websites (like content and eCommerce websites)."
This explanation is used for every XXX framework, but i can't really see why. With components you can show high dynamic data, so for me there is no difference if i use XXX or Astro.
Did somebody has some real life examples, that could explain the difference?
Or why it could be better to stay with XXX and not use Astro.
Currently we want to switch our svelte project to SvelteKit, git rid of our custom fiddle (router, etc.). But when i see Astro now, i think about what speak against using Astro? But at the moment it seems that it has many additional benefits?