Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If the competitor offers https://www.dropbox.com/install-linux, developed in the open with a GPL license, is it reasonable to tell other people to take on the cost of building and maintaining a client for your paid service?



is it reasonable to tell other people to take on the cost of building and maintaining a client for your paid service?

Google barely squeaked by with $76 billion in revenue last year. It only has 156,500 employees.

You can't possibly expect something like that from a company this resource-constrained.


They're actually not even as "resource constrained" as this comment implies, as the numbers here are off.

Per https://abc.xyz/investor/, Alphabet made $75 billion in Revenue in Q4. They made $76 billion in net income for all of 2021.


$480,000 per employee is quite decent, but hardly radical these days.


Which aspect of chromiumos drive integration and sync engine is not "developed in the open"? The dropbox source is distributed as a tarball and if you want to contribute to it "contact us". That doesn't meet my definition of "in the open".


I didn't claim that ChromiumOS's code wasn't developed in the open. The fact remains that Google neither supports nor provides a Google Drive client for Debian and its derivatives or Redhat and its derivatives, while its competitor does. It is reasonable for people to complain about this.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: