Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> It is one thing when they happen by accident, but when it is the result of capricious and hostile decisions by a vendor, it is an outrage.

I couldn't agree more. Which of these is happening with respect to the OP? It's entirely not clear.




It doesn't matter — even if it started entirely as an accident— the vendor's failure to promptly address it, and the fact that that failure is a systematic property of their operation, puts them into the outrageous category.

It's like when you're on hold for 20minutes hearing recordings about long wait timed due to "high call volume".

No, it is not high call volume, it is the damn company systematically understaffing the call center and overloading their workers to extract more money and externalize more costs onto their customers.

We should avoid doing business with them if possible.


I agree it's ridiculous that the vendor has gone radio silent -- in any other industry this would be deadly behavior.

But I've been in weird, regulatory spots before where communication is forbidden pending investigation or an audit. If you get flagged for money laundering, they're not allowed to say "hey we flagged you for money laundering", and possibly not even allowed to say "we're looking into it".




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: