Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I found this by Knuth on Iverson's notation interesting: https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/images/images/upload...



Very interesting. I did never really look at the "Concrete Mathematics" book, so I missed this take by Knuth on turning a formula F into a term [F] by defining it as 1 if F is true, and 0 if F is false. Note that this cannot be done in first-order logic, as a formula cannot be part of a term. But it is not a problem in simply-typed higher-order logic, for example, and it is not a problem in abstraction logic, either.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: