Although it isn't my intention, I do understand that this might come across as rude, but how is this different from the last few times it has been posted here on hackernews?
6 months ago, 4 months ago... It may be a good book, but it isn't new, or as far as I know, changed significantly enough to warrant being listed on the front page.
Well, I still appreciate that this article came up again. I'm still new to HN and I wouldn't have gone through the search method to find a beginner's guide to Node.
Thanks again for creating this tutorial. Great introduction to Node and also well written.
I started learning node not too long ago, this book was invaluable to me. It's well worth reading twice if not more. I bought it on kindle along with how to node[1] (which was also very well informed, but not as well written).
nodebeginner.org was awesome for getting acquainted with node.js. I purchased the book and was a bit disappointed that it didn't add a whole lot more than the tutorial but I was glad to support your efforts. Thanks for making this.
I always thought it's quite nice that the whole content is available for free, but I can see that there is room for disappointment even in this scenario :-(
I appreciate the work that was invested in this book. Thumbs up!
But:
"The aim of this document is to get you started with developing applications for Node.js, ..."
I never develop applications for node.js but instead with node.js. Yes, some people in the community seem to do the first, but serious projects are my goal.
http://www.hnsearch.com/search#request/all&q=nodebeginne...
6 months ago, 4 months ago... It may be a good book, but it isn't new, or as far as I know, changed significantly enough to warrant being listed on the front page.