Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No one said it was. But for some people for some problems what they have is definitely good enough.

Example: hdd to ssd (huge quantitative improvement if you measure speeds). As you rightly said.

To my eyes(bad eyes) 1080p is enough, 4k might look slightly better but no way near in the same ballpark as hdd to ssd. Maybe its the fonts, workflow or fontsize i use but 4k fonts does not not x5 or x10 better than 1080p fonts. I absolutely sure there are ppl that, that is true for though. YMMV shrug




For a laptop, I see diminishing returns at 3200x1800. That's as low as I'm go. 4k is preferred and now common. I don't need more.

Ironically, almost all phones I look at have more pixels than I need. Laptops are only recently easily available with reasonable pixel density. For a while, common phones had higher resolution (not just density) than laptops.


Using 4k at 2x scale, you have exactly the same desktop space as 1080p but with 4x more pixels to render your fonts.


I have bad eyes but apparently not as bad as yours. Let's go ask a blind man if they prefer 1080p or 4K, that'll settle it.

If you don't see the difference, it doesn't mean there's none.


Not OP but if you don‘t see the difference why pay for it? It will also be more taxing for the graphic card or cpu to update 4k, I believe.


Huh !? No one said 'the difference is not there'.

I said the difference is not meaningful enough (for me and many other ppl, if i read the comments) and that stating that 1080p 'is simply a none starter' and it 'cannot' render text 'correctly' it not true. It can render it more correctly yes.

To be really annoying even 8k wont render text 100% correctly since if there is a circle like section example 'p' or 'b' no pixel based device would be able to give a 'true rendition' of the symbol since you need basically infinite precision to correctly display a circle like concept on gridbased scheme(i.e pixel based display)

Sure a 4k or 8k will approximate it better but(and this is really my point

4k or 8k wil be better(yes) but 1080p it sufficient for a good subset of ppl.

Not really sure how the blind man helps either side of this discussion ?


The whole argument is silly. People coded on 21" CRT and LCD monitors at 640×480 even, and yes ... they still live!

While higher resolutions look nicer, they provide no real value for a console. I've had 4x xterms on my desktop for 30+ years.

There is zero "extra space" with higher dpi. None.

One sad downside of things looking nicer, is the battery cost.

UHD vs HD means 4x the pixels, and a GPU rendering all those pixels. If you want a 14hr battery, and light weight, you won't be getting it with a UHD screen in 2022.


Pointing at the GPU is an excuse. That thing doesn't need to go over 1% load to make good text happen.


yup !




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: