> Running logic in the kernel or in a server using a restrictive interpreter is indeed an interesting architectural possibility, but from a certain point of view it's the opposite extreme from the Kafka approach.

In general, a restricted language. You interpret or compile that language, and still have similar security guarantees.

> I hope this isn't rude, but I wrote that in response to phk's comment, so I was addressing him in it, not you, eru, although I did enjoy your comment very much as well.

Oh, that's fine. I was just confused because that came in a reply to my comment.