Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why is it “scary”? Nothing in this article established any cause for concern.

I think when people see a difference in modern life versus traditional, and that difference was unexpected and unintended, that in itself is cause for concern. I don't need to believe claims about how important the gut biome is to the brain etc. But I would be surprised if the there weren't some consequence of the difference, and it seems like wishful thinking to suppose, as you do, that the consequences are benign.




You answered the wrong question. The article reproduced a claim without substantiation.

I didn’t conclude that the effects are benign. I claimed that this article does nothing to assist me in deciding if they are.


Not knowing which way the scale tips is in-itself scary, I think. It means moving into uncharted territory.

Similarly, global warning is rising temperature, and we are trying hard to model the effects, but it's really all it is: models and guesses. We would much prefer if we could go back to the climate we were familiar with for the past 20,000 years. That one we were starting to understand to some extent. Now all bets are off


Why should article assist you in deciding of they are? That decision is not science. That decision is politics.


The article should contribute something other than being a glorified bulleted list. Why bother writing anything if in the end there is no substance?


I think OP was rather bemoaning the lack of useful information and scientific rigor. Their points were good I thought.

Whilst microbiome is a fascinating topic people are quick to lend unsubstantiated pet theories new credence, harboured by the topics nasence and complexity.

Anecdotally, logical fallacy bingo is a great actual game and I recommend everyone play




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: