Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The issue is one of "arms racing".

Consider, for example, how the FDA operates. They have a broad mandate to keep food clean and drugs safe. They don't have an explicit mandate of "you must only regulate tylenol and aspirin, we need to pass a law for new drugs each time they come up."

This ruling finds the EPA, who has the mandate to keep pollutants out of the air, can't determine that CO2 is a pollutant. Why is that? The 2016 clean air act specifically gave them the power to regulate air pollutants.

The only answer is political activism. There is no difference between the FDA's broad mandate and the EPA's broad mandate.

I recommend reading the dissent on this case. It makes it absolutely clear that this is an EPA power. The conservatives couldn't get new laws passed repealing the EPA, so instead they packed the court with political activists so they could make law from the bench.




Yet another reasonable comment that some shadow bully has downvoted gray.

HN is broken


HN is very ill-suited to discussing politics in general. That's a known feature.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: