Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think so. A human-verified, tested and maintained code is obviously superior to a snippet blindly copied and mixed by a statistical system.


That’s not how you use Copilot, any more than it’s how you’d use any other autocomplete tool. I don’t know why so many people seem to think that using Copilot is just closing your eyes, hitting tab fifty times, and then committing.

You work on your code, Copilot makes a suggestion. You read that suggestion and verify that it’s close to what you were already going to do. If it is, you hit tab, then you tweak it. There’s nothing blind about this process.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: