I couldn't find any "listicle" style top N list, the closest was "top players in quantum computing"
> awful generic CGI backgrounds
That's pretty par for the course for this tier of channel. Arguably the "quirky room with nerd tchatckies backdrop" is more authentic, but both are just filler behind a talking head.
> give me your opinion in the comments
Necessary evil to drive engagement to appease The Algo.
Imho her work is a step above the lion's share of science reporting, but I can see how she might be polarizing.
> I couldn't find any "listicle" style top N list, the closest was "top players in quantum computing"
The whole premise of the video of this article is "I give you the ten reasons why I think science suck". Sure it's not in the title (which is even more polarizing), but it's still a top ten list.
>> awful generic CGI backgrounds
> That's pretty par for the course for this tier of channel. Arguably the "quirky room with nerd tchatckies backdrop" is more authentic, but both are just filler behind a talking head.
She could just be sitting at her desk though, but I agree this is more aesthetics
and it would have not grated me if it wasn't for the other things
>> give me your opinion in the comments
> Necessary evil to drive engagement to appease The Algo.
That's exactly my point. I don't necessarily blame her, but am more lamenting the fact that all videos seem to have to become like this, if a creator wants to make a living on youtube.
> Imho her work is a step above the lion's share of science reporting, but I can see how she might be polarizing.
I'm not sure, her work is definitely not on par with quanta magazine for example.
I couldn't find any "listicle" style top N list, the closest was "top players in quantum computing"
> awful generic CGI backgrounds
That's pretty par for the course for this tier of channel. Arguably the "quirky room with nerd tchatckies backdrop" is more authentic, but both are just filler behind a talking head.
> give me your opinion in the comments
Necessary evil to drive engagement to appease The Algo.
Imho her work is a step above the lion's share of science reporting, but I can see how she might be polarizing.