Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

YouTube takes 30% for "joining" the channel.



Youtube is also a genuine platform that gets you an audience and discoverability, gets you ad revenue, and hosts your content (which in the case of streaming video is very much non-trivial technically). Patreon is a donation button with a feed. It's effectively a payment processor and in most of the world the margins in that industry are a fraction of a percent.

This is Youtube vs Patreon (https://www.pymnts.com/subscriptions/2022/vimeo-raises-rates...)

"She says she began making subscriber-only Patreon content in 2020 and hosting it on Vimeo. Then came the notice from Vimeo on March 11 that van Baarle’s bandwidth usage was in the top 1% of Vimeo’s users. So if she wanted to keep hosting her content on the site, she’d need to upgrade to a custom plan that could run her as much as $3,500 a year, given a week to make changes or leave the site. The Verge noted that her experience was just one of many — numerous Patreon creators received the notice, which has resulted in “confusion and panic.”


That's Vimeo, not Patreon. I heard that Patreon already solved that issue by working with Vimeo.

And you can't post member-only videos at Youtube. Also, Youtube is just Youtube - you can't monetize your presence in other platforms with it.


Before Patreon people had direct links to donate to them on PayPal. You can still that (or use Stripe, or Ko-Fi, or whatever).

So why do people use Patreon?

The answer to that is why Patreon can charge what they do.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: