> I think most of our disagreement is about the word ownership. I think many of the times you've used that word, it would be more accurate to say possession.

But also I'm saying that a foundational pillar of NFTs is that possession on the blockchain is the only thing that matters.

It's possible to disagree with that pillar, but removing it would destroy a huge chunk of what NFTs are.

If you want me not to say 'ownership' for that concept, that's fine.

Also I'm not making this claim about crytocurrency in general. It's only specific subsets.