Being at the author's talk earlier today, that wasn't really the spirit that it was given in. The author isn't really talking about "defeating" TLS as a technical control more as he is talking about "defeating" it as an annoyance when reverse engineering.
It's meant more as a showcase of how eBPF can be applied to a technical challenge, as opposed to the author claiming they fundamentally broke TLS.
It's meant more as a showcase of how eBPF can be applied to a technical challenge, as opposed to the author claiming they fundamentally broke TLS.