This kind of insinuation is not a good fit here. You can either explain the pertinent details that would explain the experiences described in a different light, or you can leave it as is.
Insinuating something more sinister without explaining anything does not advance the conversation in any way.
honestly, you are being far too charitable. it comes across as downright creepy, advancing the conversation or no. i wouldn't be comfortable saying any of the things in that comment to someone that i claimed to know to their face under basically any circumstances. it pretty much implies directly that OP is some sort of sexual predator, which makes the whole "lovely wife" thing sound something between creepy and vaguely threatening.
This is not dissimilar from cases where people publicly complain about their Google/PayPal/etc. accounts getting banned: they could well be genuinely innocent, or they could in fact have done something incriminating that provider’s systems became aware of but we aren't. If the latter is true, they are not even lying by simply omitting that information in their complaints (it may have slipped their mind, too), yet it can change the outlook drastically. I find the case in TFA pretty damning, but I try to catch myself before I dole out blame on anonymous complaints with little context.
The possibility that it (account banning, or what OP described) could happen to a completely innocent person makes the status quo pretty dismal already though, and well deserves discussion.
