> It seems to me that both McIlroy’s original critique and this blog post miss the point by a mile. It’s completely meaningless to compare the relative merits of the two solutions, because Knuth’s ultimate goal isn’t to produce a solution.
I don’t follow: aren’t you effectively restating the blog post’s argument? How did the blog post miss the point?
I don’t follow: aren’t you effectively restating the blog post’s argument? How did the blog post miss the point?