I don't see it as a big issue as we just assume PRs with failing builds not to be ready for review and push them back to draft. But whatever works for your team, honestly. In the end what matters is having a CI acting as authority source, the rest is simply workflow related.
Yeah, think its just a difference in mindset. Some teams strive to never have failed builds, while others don't care because its all part of the process. I think we were more in the mindset of you should never push a failing build initially, but have moved more towards its all part of the process.
