Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Does it include hydropower, which is renewable but has strong non-carbon-related undesirable environmental consequences?

IIUC, the vast majority of ecological impact caused by hydro is already done. It is not making things exponentially worse.

Am I missing something?




Depending on location, hydroelectric power can have (mostly because of decomposing vegetation) carbon-equivalent emissions ranging from several grams of COâ‚‚ per kWh, all the way up to around two thousand grams (!) per kWh. This greatly depends on location, with shallow, large-area tropical dams being the worst offenders, and cold, high altitude Nordic dams being the most environmentally friendly.


No hydro - no obstacle in the waterway, migration paths are affected but still functional. Hydro - it's a meatgrinder.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: