I'm not a systems level programmer but I personally super appreciate this kind of dialog and communication about the flaws in the programming language from prominent members in the community. I've seen it a lot more in Rust (and C++) than in most other languages. I wonder if there is a correlation between how much a language grows and changes to how many blog posts there are from prominent members in the language community outlining flaws? (Tangentially, I would love for a search engine where I could track metadata like this)
I personally think that way too often the discourse from the core team / stewards / BDFLs etc is wholly positive about their own community + the technical merits of the programming language they are representing. A healthy dose of "here are some flaws" is very refreshing and humbling, and makes me appreciate the community more.
I personally think that way too often the discourse from the core team / stewards / BDFLs etc is wholly positive about their own community + the technical merits of the programming language they are representing. A healthy dose of "here are some flaws" is very refreshing and humbling, and makes me appreciate the community more.