> our liberal democratic way isn't the only way. ... are they as strong as the Arabic people?
You seem to be suggesting that instead of elections, people can decide who their leader is by having a civil war instead.
I don't think it is chauvinism to prefer a system where fewer people have to die to effect political change over one where inevitably many more people die.
>You seem to be suggesting that instead of elections, people can decide who their leader is by having a civil war instead.
That's not my position at all. You cut context.
>I don't think it is chauvinism to prefer a system where fewer people have to die to effect political change over one where inevitably many more people die.
You and I agree here.
Would you say Russia has free and fair elections? Their election only months ago did provide a supermajority of seats.
If yes, would you agree than the average Russian supports Putin and the war?
Since this account has been using HN exclusively for political and ideological battle, I've banned it. We ban such accounts, regardless of what they're battling for, because they destroy what this site is supposed to be.
Please do not create accounts to break HN's rules with.
You seem to be suggesting that instead of elections, people can decide who their leader is by having a civil war instead.
I don't think it is chauvinism to prefer a system where fewer people have to die to effect political change over one where inevitably many more people die.