Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I inferred your argument as being that consortia are bad because of what they do (pet features), not what they are.


Without a central arbiter who takes responsibility for producing a consistent and coherent design, you would likely end up with a mish mash of pet features.

If a customer asks for a feature, you can say no if it is a bad choice. You have less leverage to do so when that 'customer' is really a paying member of a consortium.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: