> Sorry, looking through the forks, they are all in sync with master
I don't think you understand how Git works, which probably explains why you missed all the repos I needed to point out to you.
> , and most your contributions are small
What have you ever contributed? Show me.
> The only thing that I wanted to say is that as soon as you start to work in a real project with Crystal you realize that it is not just a better ruby and it comes with it's own set of problems, patterns and etc.
How would you know? Please share the repo in which you found this out. What is a "real" project?
> So I don't see a point to cite Crystal as option to ruby in every thread about ruby.
You've contributed nothing of worth, not even a specific criticism of Crystal, let alone anything worth knowing about Ruby.
> I don't think you understand how Git works, which probably explains why you missed all the repos I needed to point out to you.
LOL, you forked many repositories and didn't push any code. You just proved my point. Just people without experience in Crystal comes to ruby related threads to say "Dude, use Crystal". Happy learning <3
> LOL, you forked many repositories and didn't push any code.
Well, firstly that isn't true, and secondly even if it were true it's a good idea to fork repos you use. So, not only are you:
- childish ("LOL", really? This is HN)
- lying (always the sign of a strong argument)
- unable to search Github effectively
You also show bad development practices. Did you not see what happened this week with Colors.js[1]?
> You just proved my point.
Quite the opposite.
> Just people without experience in Crystal comes to ruby related threads to say "Dude, use Crystal".
Where is your repo showing your experience in Crystal? Or Ruby for that matter. Money where mouth is time, do you even have a single commit to a project in either language?
> You've contributed nothing of worth, not even a specific criticism of Crystal, let alone anything worth knowing about Ruby.
There is nothing in the text about Crystal. Why should I talk about Crystal?
> Where is your repo showing your experience in Crystal? Or Ruby for that matter.
I don't have too. That's not about Crystal, but about ruby :)
That's not about me and my code, not either about your little unknown rubygems, but the desire from people like to you to recommend Crystal as "drop-in" replacement for ruby, which is not.. Typical "I'm vegan" comment when people are talking about barbecue.
If you know nothing about Crystal, and seem unable to provide any evidence that you have anything of note to add about Ruby, then you have no way of knowing if Crystal can be a drop-in replacement for Ruby, and why you’re using quotes around “drop-in” when you’re the only person on the entire page to have used that word is telling.
Mendacious to the last. If you find a way to make a substantive or informed observation then do let me know, otherwise, please save it for your friends on Reddit.
I don't think you understand how Git works, which probably explains why you missed all the repos I needed to point out to you.
> , and most your contributions are small
What have you ever contributed? Show me.
> The only thing that I wanted to say is that as soon as you start to work in a real project with Crystal you realize that it is not just a better ruby and it comes with it's own set of problems, patterns and etc.
How would you know? Please share the repo in which you found this out. What is a "real" project?
> So I don't see a point to cite Crystal as option to ruby in every thread about ruby.
You've contributed nothing of worth, not even a specific criticism of Crystal, let alone anything worth knowing about Ruby.
> That's my point.
Great point.