relaxing these requirements during a period of heavily restricted air travel is an objectively correct policy
the organisation's institutional inflexibility/political inability to solve this very simple problem is yet another demonstration of the EU's current structure being unfit for purpose (or able to respond in a timely manner to current events)
> At least they can claim one good thing came out of Brexit. They need any win, however small.
there are plenty
note that any perceived negative changes are immediately reported as a direct consequence of leaving
however the converse is not true: positive changes don't tend to be reported as a direct consequence of leaving
make of this what you will
(and unsurprisingly: it takes a while to see the effects of more responsive and accountable governance)
"apparently insufficient" doesn't count as bad?
relaxing these requirements during a period of heavily restricted air travel is an objectively correct policy
the organisation's institutional inflexibility/political inability to solve this very simple problem is yet another demonstration of the EU's current structure being unfit for purpose (or able to respond in a timely manner to current events)
> At least they can claim one good thing came out of Brexit. They need any win, however small.
there are plenty
note that any perceived negative changes are immediately reported as a direct consequence of leaving
however the converse is not true: positive changes don't tend to be reported as a direct consequence of leaving
make of this what you will
(and unsurprisingly: it takes a while to see the effects of more responsive and accountable governance)