Isn’t that what we’re seeing? Nobody is saying it’s bad to be a straight white male, only that people like us are playing on easy mode. The goal is for everyone to be able to enjoy that.
There are plenty of people in those 'privileged' categories who are not playing on easy mode. A given person fitting that description isn't necessarily represented by the average
It’s okay for privilege to be intersectional. A straight white cis male can still suffer from ableism and classism. But it’s also okay to acknowledge that even in circumstances like being disabled, being perceived as a white cis straight male will have benefits compared to a black trans woman in the same situation, even if that situation sucks for both parties.
It's also okay to not assume that certain categories of people are sheltered and naive, based solely on their gender status and inferred ancestral composition. And in need of a public calling-out and talking-to, based solely on those observed properties.
Which is what started this whole sub-thread, after all.
If people were focused on their own privileges you’d see concrete examples. The parts of the article talking about green cards is a good example of this. Straight white male (and now add cis, able bodied, etc, etc, etc) used as a talismanic phrase is not focusing on your own privileges. It’s just creating a scapegoat and letting everyone that doesn’t match every last adjective off the hook.
