Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's a fact the US should be deeply ashamed of. I had no idea how bad the land mine and unexploded bomb situation is until I visited Cambodia and Laos where even 50 years after the war people are still getting their limbs blown off.



All the countries that didn't ban land mines are all the same countries that were, essentially, expecting to fight wars in the near future.


Read up on the difference between persistent and non-persistent land mines [1]. The US only uses non-persistent mines that last usually 24-72 hours. The issue with 50 years later is not accurate since non-persistent mines haven’t been commonplace for decades and officially outlawed in 2004 [2]. Only place the US allows persistent mines is at the DMZ. There’s also a distinction between anti-personnel mines and anti-vehicle mines, which the US has a clearer distinction about than others. The Ottawa Treaty only bans anti-personnel mines [3], so the US in one of few countries that has a policy banning the use of persistent anti-vehicle mines.

[1] https://sites.duke.edu/lawfire/2021/04/12/understanding-u-s-...

[2] https://2001-2009.state.gov/t/pm/wra/c11735.htm

[3] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottawa_Treaty


How many of the non persistent mines will fail to disarm and still be a danger? I would expect quite a few.

In my mind they should have been banned like biological weapons. And the US could take leadership


I’m sure Russia and China have similar excuses :->




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: