Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> That's the problem with the, "I'll get over it/I'm not worried/My segment of the population doesn't die from it" mentality. The more infections - subclinical, asymptomatic, severe, fatal, undetected - the more rolls of the dice.

The vaccines we're currently using don't prevent infection as they do not provide sterilising immunity. To quote[1] Sunetra Gupta[2], infectious disease epidemiologist and a professor of theoretical epidemiology at the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford:

> The vaccines that we currently employ appear to be highly effective in preventing life-threatening illness but do not meaningfully contribute to the maintenance of herd immunity.

> …we find ourselves trapped by the superannuated conviction that vaccines must block infection as well as disease.

Given that, how is contrasting those who've had vaccines with those who haven't of any relevance? We have other comments in the thread (like this one[3]) pointing out that it could be immuno-compromised people that are the main source of new variants. Right now, they're among the least likely people to have been vaccinated.

[1] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/11/24/vaccines-never-r...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunetra_Gupta

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29354300




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: