I don't know. There's some brutally honest feedback that I would appreciate. Like, if my feedback was like Rust. Here's a list of the 6 things you did wrong, a helpful diagram for how to understand the failure, a few tips for improvement, and a link if you want to read more.
On the other hand ... a lot of feedback feels more like ocaml. Something's wrong. It's probably on this line. Maybe. Does "int * int * int" mean anything to you? Look maybe go put some parens on some of your match statements or something. Good luck fixing it.
Of the significant critical feedbacks that I've gotten (in tech) only one of them was like a Rust compiler feedback. The others were much more like working with ocaml. And pragmatically they didn't even seem to be valid (a lot of subjective-ness was involved, so I can't say they were objectively wrong ... but when followed bad things happened).
On the other hand ... a lot of feedback feels more like ocaml. Something's wrong. It's probably on this line. Maybe. Does "int * int * int" mean anything to you? Look maybe go put some parens on some of your match statements or something. Good luck fixing it.
Of the significant critical feedbacks that I've gotten (in tech) only one of them was like a Rust compiler feedback. The others were much more like working with ocaml. And pragmatically they didn't even seem to be valid (a lot of subjective-ness was involved, so I can't say they were objectively wrong ... but when followed bad things happened).