Nah, what's full of shit is you up on your intellectual high-horse acting as if you're the god of all knowable and unknowable things.
You yourself - o great one and master of all logic and intelligence - should know that a conclusion can still be true even if there is no well-documented evidence simply because enough research hasn't been done yet.
But of course it's much easier to blow people off with a "cite your sources, bruh" and then act like you know everything with a zero-effort comment. Yea, pretty sure it's you that's full of shit.
Attacking another user like that will get you banned here, regardless of how wrong they are or you feel they are. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and not post like this again, we'd be grateful.
Seen as how you aren't originally apart of the thread. This clearly struck a nerve. Are you okay?
By the way I didn't act like I know everything, I acted confident in the absence of knowledge about a thing and challenged someone on their bold claim to which to me requires good evidence.
What your comment misses completely is when I say I'd be delighted in a response that has some evidence I really do mean that.
Cant you have to agree it gets tiring reading statements that assert bold claims of which have such a low probability of credibility.
