I think this is a promising start! However, it’s a rather abstract argument and might be improved by concrete examples.
One aspect of humility might be to avoid abstract generalizations and stick to shallow observations. For example, instead of arguing that some kinds of architecture are good and other kinds of architecture are terrible, and speculating about why, you could simply say, “this building looks good to me” and “I don’t like how this building looks.”
Or you could say that a particular article seems plausible or implausible to you, rather than saying it’s true or false.
But making universal-sounding claims is an ingrained habit that seems hard to shake.
One aspect of humility might be to avoid abstract generalizations and stick to shallow observations. For example, instead of arguing that some kinds of architecture are good and other kinds of architecture are terrible, and speculating about why, you could simply say, “this building looks good to me” and “I don’t like how this building looks.”
Or you could say that a particular article seems plausible or implausible to you, rather than saying it’s true or false.
But making universal-sounding claims is an ingrained habit that seems hard to shake.