Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm surprised the author does not mention taking steps to verify the "unique University of Texas protocol" hypothesis. It really looks like the most probable alternative explanation, and it doesn't seem very difficult for someone already in the medical industry to get in touch with one of the people there who could be able to verify it. Maybe I'm missing something ?


> Maybe I'm missing something ?

I'm afraid it appears so.

The article says they contacted the authors of both publications but haven't got a response back yet. Relevant bit:

"For my own part, I’ve contacted authors of both papers, but haven’t received substantive responses from either. I’ll update this post when/if I do."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: