Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

How can you claim that getting PR is merit based when the criteria is opaque?



While the system is opaque, there's enough data points of people who have gone through it to create a set.

Origin of country matters, so does race. The uniqueness of your job matters as well especially if it "can benefit Singapore society", <S$150k pay not so much. If you integrate yourself into society, have locals who can vouch (this one is not opaque, they ask for character references).

"Benefiting Singapore society" is this catch all term and very opaque/hard to pin down. But I've seen middle managers at colleges not get PR while classroom teachers do. But not all things were equal so it's very hard to tell, but there is/are discussions around it.

Over the years it has gotten increasing harder to obtain PR and thusly citizenship.


Pretty much all of that sounds awful.


If I may stretch the truth a little to rant, at this point the only systems that have any hope of being merit-based are opaque.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: