I tried fibonacci test. It was also 43M. But fib(40) was 20 times faster than in... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

timonoko on Sept 17, 2021 | parent | context | favorite | on: Building Common Lisp Executables

I tried fibonacci test. It was also 43M. But fib(40) was 20 times faster than in Clisp. Something was compiled indeed. Who cares about the program size nowadays.

xedrac on Sept 17, 2021 | [–]

For those that want to do lisp on embedded, binary size can be very important.

johnisgood on Sept 17, 2021 | [–]

I mentioned it because a lot of people do. Personally it does not affect me.

Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact