Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You get plenty of requests for the static part of it and less so for actual ipv4. If there was an option for static ipv6 then people would also request that instead. Static IPs have use cases that people in the wild need, however I don’t think anyone cares if it’s ipv4 or ipv6.



I mean, I'd love static both, but I'm going to ask for static v4 first, because I can always run a tunnel for static v6.


Why couldn't you do it the other way around? Run a tunnel for static IPv4 over IPv6.


Because there's not a mainstream (and free) tunnel broker for IPv4.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: