"posting facts that were inconvenient to the mainstream Covid narrative"; debatable.
Whole article is rife with hyperbole and strong, strong opinions stated as fact. Censorship is bad, but pretending to be an expert doesn't make you a martyr if you get axed.
I've never been convinced by the argument that places like Twitter, Facebook, etc are open forums for discussion, and that all of your rights in the public sphere immediately transfer to these private places. Open to being persuaded otherwise.
Substack is a content trickle squeeze, writers elevating SS network effects plan to get paid by them one day but they won't outlast the minority rule. The claims of not being a substack shill did not convince me to undo my:
I also found it funny how this post about censorship is the only one not available in my Feedburner RSS feed [1] of Zerohedge. I will need to find another source.
Whole article is rife with hyperbole and strong, strong opinions stated as fact. Censorship is bad, but pretending to be an expert doesn't make you a martyr if you get axed.
I've never been convinced by the argument that places like Twitter, Facebook, etc are open forums for discussion, and that all of your rights in the public sphere immediately transfer to these private places. Open to being persuaded otherwise.