In regards to the vendor solutions you mentioned. While those are all strong solutions as a stand alone product, they must be bought separately and integrated together to gain the maximum value out of end to end threat detection and response.
Splunk as a standalone analytics problem still requires engineering talent to increase the efficacy of detection of malicious activity, and then you have to purchase Phantom (SOAR) separately at an expensive cost to benefit from automated incident remediation workflows. This leads to lengthy implementation cycles, and post sales management that can rival the license cost itself. Also there is the component of human error when it comes to creating the detection logic and response logic necessary with consultants doing the work on the behalf of the customer.
We actually have MSPs and MSSPs leveraging our platform to deliver security services for their customers. We take the Managed Security Service component off of their plate, and they hire only security analyst to drive their monitoring and response as a service. Some customers will want a full suite of services that could be out of our scope, but if a customer is looking to gain insights and a simple to operate security operations platform then ContraForce would be a great fit! Lastly, the cost typically associated per User/month for MSSPs are quite expensive. This makes it a costly check-box for many companies and they have to hope that the MSSP has amazing engineering talent to not miss malicious activity in their environment.
In regards to the vendor solutions you mentioned. While those are all strong solutions as a stand alone product, they must be bought separately and integrated together to gain the maximum value out of end to end threat detection and response.
Splunk as a standalone analytics problem still requires engineering talent to increase the efficacy of detection of malicious activity, and then you have to purchase Phantom (SOAR) separately at an expensive cost to benefit from automated incident remediation workflows. This leads to lengthy implementation cycles, and post sales management that can rival the license cost itself. Also there is the component of human error when it comes to creating the detection logic and response logic necessary with consultants doing the work on the behalf of the customer.
We actually have MSPs and MSSPs leveraging our platform to deliver security services for their customers. We take the Managed Security Service component off of their plate, and they hire only security analyst to drive their monitoring and response as a service. Some customers will want a full suite of services that could be out of our scope, but if a customer is looking to gain insights and a simple to operate security operations platform then ContraForce would be a great fit! Lastly, the cost typically associated per User/month for MSSPs are quite expensive. This makes it a costly check-box for many companies and they have to hope that the MSSP has amazing engineering talent to not miss malicious activity in their environment.