"Still, in certain markets they are not a "minor" player, and even then that still doesn't give them an excuse to abuse the position."

1. In which markets does Apple have a majority, i.e. monopoly, position?

2. Given that the answer to point 1 is "none," they have no monopolistic position to abuse.

Special rules only come into play when one player effectively controls an entire market, like MSFT and personal computers in the late 90s.

You don't get to draw the market boundaries in such a way as to establish that Apple has some weird, narrowly defined monopoly.