What does this even mean? Pushing a Mac-exclusive app is hard enough, now you're further delineating between different "customer profiles"? It's an open-source app, it's "customer profile" is everyone with the means to install it, and their developers are the same people who use it on a daily basis.
Even still, your purported "corporate developers" would probably be more interested in privacy than your typical client, considering that corporations literally pay tens of thousands of dollars for proprietary tools like this, just so they have someone to hold liable if it breaks.
In either case, privacy is not a choice when you're working this low on the stack. You need to be operating with the lowest possible performance and telemetry options, or else you start to compromise the value proposition of your product. I wouldn't be surprised if this comment section acts as a good wake-up call to the core development team to switch their priorities, because developers don't agree with their current paradigm.
Even still, your purported "corporate developers" would probably be more interested in privacy than your typical client, considering that corporations literally pay tens of thousands of dollars for proprietary tools like this, just so they have someone to hold liable if it breaks.
In either case, privacy is not a choice when you're working this low on the stack. You need to be operating with the lowest possible performance and telemetry options, or else you start to compromise the value proposition of your product. I wouldn't be surprised if this comment section acts as a good wake-up call to the core development team to switch their priorities, because developers don't agree with their current paradigm.