His comment added a lot more to the conversation that your comment (or mine.)
Sometimes pedantism is important and useful. In this case I have no problems imagining that we could reframe our understanding of how to design traffic systems by reframing the language we use to talk about how those systems fail.
Not that I necessarily agree, but I don't think you can dismiss the argument by waving your hands and saying "pedantism is bad".
Sometimes pedantism is important and useful. In this case I have no problems imagining that we could reframe our understanding of how to design traffic systems by reframing the language we use to talk about how those systems fail.
Not that I necessarily agree, but I don't think you can dismiss the argument by waving your hands and saying "pedantism is bad".